Letters for October 31, 2013

We’re tight

Re “State of Health” (Feature area, Oct. 11):

Thanks to RN&R and Dennis Myers for another great piece, “State of Health.” I have a better understanding of where Nevada is at in terms of health care and also how we got here. Once again, Nevada’s zeitgeist appears to favor the rich and powerful. Maybe Myers would be willing to write another in-depth piece on our state/county tax structures and how they compare to other states/counties nearby? Others seem to be able to maintain schools without the gnashing of teeth we experience in Washoe County every time the subject comes up. Maybe, if we were made aware of what’s going on outside of Truckee Meadows, we might be less tightfisted.

Valerie Truce

Reno

Editor’s note: Dennis recommends his story “It happens”(Feature story, May 23) as a possible starting point.

That’s a fact

Re “Doctors’ secret” (Feature story, Oct. 24):

Seeing this subject from the doctor’s perspective is enlightening. I have always felt doctors were more pragmatic than the rest of us, but had no proof. I have always felt that religion and “the hospital profit motive” often get in the way of the decisions made by the patient (before their incapacitation). And political opposition to reasonable end-of-life care has also hampered this discussion. I couldn’t help but be frustrated by the argument over “death panels” when this kind of discussion could help reach a goal of cutting costs to Medicare and Medicaid, which would improve overall benefits to those programs.

“We can’t fix everything” and “accept our fates” are two pragmatic principles I adhere to, and I resent the obtrusiveness of politics and religion trying to override my decisions. And frankly, my decisions are based on these few things: I do not want to spend my last days suffering through hopeless “cures;” I don’t want to waste my family’s meager inheritance; I don’t want to make it painful for them to make decisions on their own. If we are to be free to live our own lives, I do not see why we cannot decide how to end our lives.

Tom Distad

Reno

A better death

Re “Doctors’ secret” (Feature story, Oct. 24):

The article hits the nail right on the head. Hospitals and physicians are required to save lives. It seems that, in our society, death has become “medicalized,” and “borderline curative medical procedures” are often promoted over the quality of inevitable death. One aspect that people/relatives do not know is that even though you have a Do Not Resuscitate (at a bedside, your local hospital or your doctor’s office), if for some reason you call an ambulance, say, for your terminal ill parent in the home, the ambulance folks will disregard your DNR—they are not lawyers or doctors in the know of your situation or the patient’s—and perform life saving duties on the patient. Also, if the patient is taken to a different hospital than normal, they will do life saving acts, since they do not know about the DNR or they fail to consult with you. We carried notarized DNRs for my wife’s mother around with us and provided them to relatives.

This is what happened to my infirm 83-plus-year-old mother-in-law. She was in normal age-related failing mental health for several years following her husband’s cancer-related death. She also suffered a moderately debilitating stroke during his decline. Both had lawyer-prepared paperwork about their end-of-life wishes and assigned health-care agents in the event that she became unable to make her own decisions. DNRs were part of their wishes. During her time in a care home, she had two or more trips to the ER and resuscitation, she lingered on for several years in a semi-vegetative state.

We were not available when the emergency folks were summoned and arrived several hours after transfer to the hospital. We had her DNR on file at a neighborhood hospital (right around the corner, which was not her primary care hospital). Her primary care hospital was 20 miles away. Communication problems night shift nurses at the care home and the evening staff at the hospital resulted in her receiving life saving care over her stuttering verbal protests. Therefore, she lingered on for a few more years in a semi-vegetative and declining state of life. Due to all the stress involved in managing her mother’s care from Reno and in person, my loving and caring wife of 45 years wound up dying before her mother.

Frequent monthly trips (400-mile round trip) to visit her and hasty trips to be near her bedside, took a big toll on my wife’s own health. I had to establish a DNR for my wife, she was 64 years young, at a local Reno hospital, five hours after she was admitted for a breathing problem. After a heroic effort by the staff, they gave me the choice of heart/lung machines and feeding tubes, or let her pass painlessly into the night. Since her brain had been starved of oxygen for a significant period of time during the resuscitation and she was in an induced coma, I sadly and loving let her pass painlessly.

I firmly believe in both the quality of life (living and active, not just surviving), and the quality of death (one that is pain-free and serene).

Dean Chaney

Sun Valley

Minority rules

When did it become “the will of the minority” when it comes to the determining the nature of this nation? We’re now in a situation where a very small group of representatives is trying to dictate policy despite what anyone else thinks. These representatives claim that they’re only doing what our constituents elected them to do. While this makes for a nice sound-bite, it is completely contrary to the concept of “the will of the people” which is what they incessantly bellow at us on a daily basis. These representatives and their constituents have to accept that there is a limit of their right to determine policy. The basic idea is that we all get a say in things, and we express our opinions with our votes. This constant denial to allow votes on things that everyone knows will pass if a vote were held has to stop. There is a lot of talk these days about throwing all the bums out. I would suggest a more refined option—throw out the bums who are preventing democracy from happening. Deadlock only happens when the will of the majority is ignored.

Michel Rottmann

Virginia City Highlands

Loud pipes

Re “Bad vibes” (Upfront, Oct. 24):

Yes, motorcyclists bring money into our economy, but they need to be roped in a little. The last group of bikers had little or no respect for the citizens who call Reno home, rode with reckless abandon. Also, really, are those pipes legal? You can’t play your music that loud without a citation, so how is a deafening roar OK? I ride three days a week, seven in summer, but I wouldn’t have anything to do with this “event.” Certainly, I am not calling them all bad but the few ruin it for everyone else. I don’t ride during that week because they bring out the hate in people who drive cars, as I would understand, and the hate lasts for a couple of weeks afterward.

Peter Hillman

Reno